In my previous post, I briefly mentioned about time value of money and opportunity cost. Today, I am going to focus on opportunity cost. From a numerical perspective, it is easy to define what cost is – essentially the price you pay in exchange for something. What about value? How do you stick a number to value? How do you define opportunity cost in that transaction? There are a few ways to think about it.

**Hourly wage**

This is applicable to any salaried employees, just like myself.

To calculate your hourly wage, it is as simple as taking your net income per month (including EPF contribution through employer) and dividing it by the number of hours you work, or are at work. Illustratively, If I make RM5,600 a month net and I spend 160 hour a month at work, my hourly wage is RM35/hour.

It sounds little isn’t it? Every day I spend about 1/3 of my day at work, and potentially longer if I include the hypothetical commute time of 2 hours – the proportion of time I spend at work is closer to 42%. If I include the commute time in my calculation, my hourly wage is even lower – now it is RM31/hour.

Now, instead of looking merely at a price tag and the “I can afford it” mentality, try to look at every service or product you are trying to purchase – how many hours of work in exchange for that? If you hate every working hour with a passion, this metric should help you in evaluating your decisions.

**Interest foregone/accrued**

This is a FIRE/personal finance favourite, easily illustrated by the following scenario, or the well known “latte effect”. Starbucks is often the victim example, but given the climate in Malaysia, I will replace it with “bubble tea effect”.

A cup of bubble tea now is approaching RM12/cup. If you get a cup of RM12 bubble tea a week (hopefully sugar free), 52 weeks x 12 = RM624/year. Let’s say if you invest the money at a 6% per annum interest (624 x 1.06^20), you’re actually forgoing RM2,000 instead of RM624 in the bubble tea drinking habit.

Another crucial example is interest accrued on debt or credit. If you have RM1,000 right now and you have a credit card debt of RM1,000 running at an interest p.a. of 18%, ALWAYS pay the credit bill first, unless investing the money returns you a guaranteed interest of 20%. Doesn’t sound realistic? That’s why paying credit card comes first.

**Cost per use and resale value**

The reason why we buy something is that we expect to derive value out of it, but what is the right price to pay? You can tackle it by considering the cost per use. If a game is RM60 and you obtain an enjoyable experience of 60 hour, the cost for such entertainment is only RM1. While the ‘value’ that one can derive from such activity varies from person to person (and the opportunity cost for spending time on such events), you can use such method to evaluate the purchase.

Another thing to take into consideration is resale value. Just go on any second hand market place such as Carousell, mudah, lelong etc. to know what prices some of the second hand items fetch. For instance, Myvi has a better resale value than Axia of the same mileage and the depreciation is not as drastic. From anecdotal personal experience, stuff like clothes and books have almost nil resell value. Think extra hard about the utility of such purchase. I mostly end up just donating my books to the library and I swear by ebooks now.

**IRR/NPV**

In corporate finance, evaluating business opportunities using the Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) and Net Present Value (“NPV”) is a common practice. NPV is a more preferred method for a number of reasons which I will leave out. If you’re interested, the great web has a plethora of sources that will explain the intricacies to you.

Using the NPV method is beneficial as it incorporates the following elements: timing of cash flows, be it negative or positive, and time value of money or cost of capital. If the NPV is positive, the project is worth pursuing; and if not, you get the gist. While your prediction may not be 100% accurate, it gives you a good way to think about pursuing certain projects and how you should allocate resources.

I will give an example, and you can find the worksheet for this exercise here.

**NPV worksheet – to pursue a master’s degree or not (Link)**

Let’s say I want to pursue a master degree in data science in an American university. Room and board, and course fees are about USD80k a year. I am forgoing a year’s worth of salary, USD80k to pursue this degree but I expect that I can get an incremental USD40k per year for 5 years. Should I pursue this option?

Based on the model, it takes about 4 years for that to happen. Whether it is worth it or not, it depends on you. The model is simplistic, but you can play around with the assumptions.

There are other capital budgeting methods such as breakeven period, but NPV trumps them all.

That’s all from me this week. I’m trying to keep up a posting frequency of once per week so do stay tuned!